Resultados de Búsqueda
Do not remove hair systematically to reduce the risk of surgical site infection. If necessary, use suitable hair clippers (electric razors, hair clippers, chemical hair removal).
Compromiso por la calidad de las Sociedades Científicas en España
Sociedad Española Medicina Preventiva, Sociedad Española de Medicina Preventiva Salud Pública e Hi
-
ver más ... 2017Don’t order annual electrocardiograms (ECGs) for low-risk patients without symptoms.
Choosing Wisely Canada
Canadian Cardiovascular Society
Don’t obtain screening electrocardiogram testing in individuals who are asymptomatic and at low risk for coronary heart disease. In asymptomatic individuals at low risk for coronary heart disease (10-year risk <10%), screening for coronary heart disease with electrocardiography does not improve patient outcomes.
ver más ... 2017It's not recommended performing echocardiography as routine follow-up for mild, asymptomatic native valve disease in adult patients with no change in signs or symptoms.
Choosing Wisely Canada
Canadian Cardiovascular Society
Patients with native valve disease usually have years without symptoms before the onset of deterioration. An echocardiogram is not recommended yearly unless there is a change in clinical status.
ver más ... 2017It's not recommended performing stress cardiac imaging or advanced non-invasive imaging as a pre operative assessment in patients scheduled to undergo low-risk non-cardiac surgery.
Choosing Wisely Canada
Canadian Cardiovascular Society
Non-invasive testing is not useful for patients undergoing low-risk non-cardiac surgery (e.g., cataract removal). These types of tests do not change the patient’s clinical management or outcomes.
ver más ... 2017It's not recommended performing annual stress cardiac imaging or advanced non-invasive imaging as part of routine follow-up in asymptomatic patients.
Choosing Wisely Canada
Canadian Cardiovascular Society
Performing stress cardiac imaging or advanced non-invasive imaging in patients without symptoms on a serial or scheduled pattern (e.g., every one to two years or at a heart procedure anniversary) rarely results in any meaningful change in patient management. This practice may, in fact, lead to unnecessary invasive procedures and excess radiation exposure without any proven impact on patients’ outcomes. An exception to this rule would be for patients more than five years after a bypass ...
ver más ... 2017